GPT in Mathematics

The Transformative Role of AI in Mathematical Inquiry

Tiago Veríssimo
3 min readDec 8, 2024
Photo by Levart_Photographer on Unsplash

Large Language Models (LLMs) have experienced an unprecedented adoption rate in recent years, with over 300 million users globally. This rapid proliferation marks a significant milestone, but even more noteworthy is the continual evolution of these systems. LLMs are becoming not only increasingly accessible but also substantially more powerful. Key players in the development of this technology include:

  • OpenAI
  • Google
  • Anthropic

This blog focuses on OpenAI’s offerings, which currently maintain a competitive edge. Specifically, I explore the application of ChatGPT in advanced mathematical tasks, as elementary mathematics has become trivial for contemporary LLMs.

OpenAI offers various tiers of LLM access, and I propose the following workflows tailored to user categories.

Workflow for free users

Free-tier users are limited to a streamlined version of GPT-4, referred to as GPT-4o. To maximize the utility of GPT-4o, I recommend leveraging its web search capabilities, which research demonstrates are particularly effective for advanced mathematical inquiries. Tasks such as problem-solving are better suited for the o1 models, which are discussed in subsequent sections.

Historically, conducting web searches for mathematical content was cumbersome, often requiring manual LaTeX input and navigating poorly designed websites. GPT-4o has transformed this experience by enabling natural language queries and automating the technical details.

Optimal use cases for web search include:

  • Consulting as a mathematical encyclopedia
  • Seeking strategic insights when encountering difficulties

This functionality significantly enhances the efficiency of mathematical research and problem-solving workflows.

Workflow for premium users

Subscribers to GPT gain access to both GPT-4o for web searches and the more advanced o1 models for mathematical problem-solving. The o1 models implement OpenAI’s “Chain of Thought” (CoT) methodology, enabling logical coherence and complex reasoning.

Recommended applications of o1 models include:

  • Direct Problem-Solving: Provide the model with contextual information and a copy-pasted problem statement.
  • Interactive Problem-Solving: Collaboratively engage with the AI to address complex problems.

In the first scenario, the AI independently generates solutions based on the provided input. The second scenario fosters a more dynamic interaction, where you might solve part of the problem while the AI completes the remainder or suggests alternative strategies. This interactivity enhances both understanding and efficiency.

Workflow for Super-Premium Users

Super-Premium users have access to o1-pro, a refined version of o1 with enhanced capabilities. Studies indicate that o1-pro offers notable improvements in mathematical reasoning over its predecessor, though the margin of enhancement may not always justify the cost. For those who can afford it, o1-pro is highly recommended. However, the standard o1 models remain robust and effective for most advanced applications.

Observations from Contemporary Classrooms

Students across all educational levels are increasingly reliant on AI tools. A visit to any library reveals countless students utilizing GPT interfaces. However, the majority use these tools for quick solutions without engaging deeply with the underlying concepts. This reliance presents both challenges and opportunities. Without proper comprehension, the AI-generated outputs risk becoming meaningless and even detrimental to the user’s learning process.

Empowering Learners and Researchers While Addressing Academic Resistance

Both learners and researchers require guidance in leveraging AI tools effectively. Many students depend on AI for complete solutions, while researchers often dismiss chatbots as inadequate for scholarly work. The middle ground lies in fostering informed and responsible AI usage.

Educational efforts should prioritize:

  • Prompt Engineering: Teaching students how to frame effective queries.
  • Capability Awareness: Demonstrating the real strengths and limitations of LLMs.
  • Workflows and Examples: Providing concrete workflows and examples of productive AI interactions.

Despite academia’s frequent resistance to integrating AI, such opposition is unsustainable. AI is already reshaping the educational landscape. The way forward involves embedding AI within academic frameworks, anticipating its use in students’ workflows, and designing curricula that leverage AI’s strengths. This approach enables students to engage with more complex problems, fostering deeper learning and understanding.

Conclusion

The rapid advancement of AI, evidenced by its growing efficacy in mathematical problem-solving, should not inspire fear but rather strategic adoption. By defining structured workflows and integrating AI responsibly into education, we can harness this transformative technology to benefit learners and researchers. Thoughtful, informed use of AI promises to deliver more rigorous, engaging, and effective educational experiences.

Newcastle Upon Tyne, England

--

--

Tiago Veríssimo
Tiago Veríssimo

Written by Tiago Veríssimo

Mathematics PhD Student at Newcastle University I write about mathematics in very simple terms and typically use computers to showcase concepts.

No responses yet